Currently in the process of applying for authorisation.

Coinsonnet vs CopperX

CopperX brings Stripe-like ergonomics to stablecoin payments. Coinsonnet pairs that ergonomics with deeper rails: custody, mass payouts, and broader ramp coverage.

Why switch

Broader coverage

Local payment rails and off-ramps in 30 EEA countries.

Custody included

Qualified MPC custody as part of the platform, not an integration.

Mass payouts

Thousands of recipients per batch with per-recipient status.

Deeper compliance

Travel-rule support and proof-of-reserves attestations.

Side by side

Feature by feature

Compiled from publicly available information as of June 2026 and may not reflect recent changes. Spot something out of date? Tell us.

CoinsonnetCopperX
Payments
Hosted checkout & payment links
Subscriptions & recurring billing
Invoicing
Mass payoutsLimited
Settlement to fiatSame day
Platform
Supported blockchains10+10+
Supported assets40+Stablecoin-focused
Custody modelQualified MPC custodyThird-party
On & off rampsOff-ramp focus
Compliance
Built-in KYT & sanctions screening
Travel-rule supportNot listed
Regulatory licensingIn applicationLimited public detail
Developers & support
SDKs (TS, Python, Go, Java)API + JS
Webhook replayNot listed
Support24/7Business hours
Pricing
Setup & monthly feesNoneNone
Transaction feeFrom 0.4%~1%

FAQ

Switching questions, answered

We like CopperX's developer experience — how does yours compare?

Same philosophy: one elegant API, instant sandbox, idiomatic SDKs in four languages, and webhooks with replay. Try the sandbox and judge directly.

Do you also focus on stablecoins?

Yes — stablecoins are the core of the platform — but we also support BTC, ETH, and 40+ assets for acceptance, with conversion on settlement.

What does migration involve?

API concepts map closely. Most teams port an integration in days; hosted flows can switch immediately.

See the difference yourself

Run a test transaction in the sandbox, or talk to our team about migrating.